Skip to content

On the use of the @ syntax by Google Buzz

Just a quick note to archive the way Google Buzz is using the @ syntax. From “Google Buzz Tips“:

If you’d like to send a private message to someone, type @ and use Gmail’s autocomplete feature to find the email address of your contact.

In practice, you address other users by typing an @ symbol followed by their e-mail address, like @user@example.com. This is exactly what I proposed a while ago as an easy way to address any user on any Web application:

Afterthought question: can this microsyntax be expanded to @user@application so that we can finally address any user on any Web application easily. I’m thinking about that.

For now, you can only send messages to other Google Buzz users but I’d expect this syntax to be used to address users of other supported destinations (twitter et al).

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

6 Comments

  1. @sergio wrote:

    One problem with that: When messaging someone on a Buzz using that notation, you are exposing that someone's email address to all your network or even to public if you opt to have a public profile.

    Monday, February 15, 2010 at 2:48 pm | Permalink
  2. I respect your opinion but I think that's a non-issue: Google as well as other applications can easily mask e-mail addresses on the presentation layer.

    Monday, February 15, 2010 at 3:09 pm | Permalink
  3. lmjabreu wrote:

    @sergio The email isn’t exposed, only the name is displayed.

    Monday, February 15, 2010 at 4:21 pm | Permalink
  4. @sergio wrote:

    I agree with you, it can be masked, but google didn't mask it. My comment was focused on the Google implementation while your post was on the concept itself.

    Tuesday, February 16, 2010 at 7:45 pm | Permalink
  5. @sergio wrote:

    What I've seen is that the name appears if that person is on your contact list. If it is not, the email gets exposed. MAybe they already solved this..

    Tuesday, February 16, 2010 at 7:47 pm | Permalink
  6. Amy wrote:

    @sergio The email isn’t exposed, only the name is displayed.

    Friday, April 23, 2010 at 1:51 pm | Permalink

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared.